Archive for August, 2004

Men Need Women

August 30th, 2004 by Howard | 1 Comment | Filed in Main

Several days ago I wrote about how silly women screw up emails with background and “Stationeries” and whistling animated muskrats to the point that no one can actually read the damn thing! I may have even said women were whackos!

The truth is – men need women a lot more than they need us. Hate to admit that, but it is true. Women are the civilizers of the world. Think back to middle school, when two boys would get into a fistfight. What would the rest of us guys do? Run over to the disturbance, stop in front of them and shout, “Hit him again Larry!” and “You call that an uppercut! Kick him in the nuts Darrell!”

But then a girl would come along. She would yell at them to stop fighting. Now, instantly, they would. Why? Men need women. Boys need girls. The guy who was losing didn’t want to be embarrassed in front of a girl, so he wants to stop fighting. The guy who was winning doesn’t want the girl to feel sorry for the loser. So, they both stop fighting!

Women believe in furniture. And décor. Most men consider their house or apartment totally decorated if nothing is blocking the TV or the refrigerator. Couches are optional. Food and a TV keep most men happy. Or at least out of trouble. Curtains? Ahhh, just drop the window awning, that will do. Coffee table? What, this Dell computer cardboard box isn’t working?

Enter a woman, and furniture appears. Curtains. Carpets. The dark green thing in the ‘fridge that’s taking to waving at you in the mornings is gone, and long term food is there in it’s place.

Before you know it, you are out in the front yard mowing and edging and trimming tree branches.

Women are civilizers. We need them.
So does the world.

FeMail

August 26th, 2004 by Howard | 1 Comment | Filed in Main

Dear Some Cranky Guy,

My job requires lots of emailing, and I get these idiotic emails from women at work that have multicolored flowering backgrounds, singing animated butterflies, and writing in weird 10th century Chinese fonts. I can’t read a single blessed word! Why do women do this?

Signed,

Distraught Guy at Work

Dear DGW:

Because women are friggin whackos, that’s why! You won’t find a man flowering up his email to the point you think you are receiving a message from a Gay banjo playing yodeling florist! Why might that be? It is the age old battle between FUNCTION and STYLE! Guys want function. Women want style. If you are a guy reading this, stare down at your feet. What do you see on them? Nice flat shoes or sneakers. All or most of the bottom of the shoe actually rests on the ground. What a friggin concept! Eh???? Shoes that actually allow you to walk! Now, if you are a woman, look at your feet. What do ya see honey? Yep. Some weird assed high heeled contraption that in a man’s world would never qualify as footwear. You got maybe a dimes worth of shoe touching ground in front, and a high heel jamming your heels (and ass) up in the air. It’s amazing you chicks can even walk at all! But hey, they sure look stylish, don’t they babes?

If a woman designed a car, you know what you would get? You would get the most beautiful fluffy thing with rounded corners and stylist straight lines coupled with frumpy stuff all over it. Would it run? Hell no! It ain’t for transportation dude, it’s for show! It is stylish! It is designed to sit in your driveway and look pretty, but it wouldn’t even have a freaking engine!!! Just like those “fake” pillows women put on the bed that you can’t actually use as a pillow! Or the fancy cloth towels they hang in the bathroom that, you guessed it bubba; you can’t ever use for a damn towel!

So, if all you have to worry about DGW is some retarded emails all buffed up with colored backgrounds and squirrelly fonts, be thankful. Besides, do you really want to be able to read what they are writing?

Dear Some Cranky Guy,

So, uh, what about those little emotion icons they put in emails, you know, the giant yellow happy face that jumps up and down in the email, or the meowing cat?

Thanks,

Still Distraught Guy at Work,

Dear SDGW,

Can ya get a normal name dude? Like Vern or Ralph? Anyway, same thing. Women. They are emotional creatures. Just you never, ever, tell one that. Holy mackerel, she would jump on your case with both feet and scratch your bladder out. Nope, women are JUST like men. Equal pay, equal work. Except men don’t waste their entire day creating crappy email “stationary” and inserting jumping dolphins and tweeting blue birds. If a guy ever did wanted to do something like that, he’ll put a miniature pit bull in the email that would pop out of the computer and sniff the gal’s hooters. Hmmm……wait a minute; I might be on to something here! Gotta go SDGW. Stop reading your email and go fetch a life, hear?

SCG

Too Many Lawyers!

August 24th, 2004 by Howard | No Comments | Filed in Jokes, Observations

Do you think we have too many lawyers in America? Well, in my view one is too many. I’m sorry if you are a lawyer, but unless you are one of those three lawyers in the country dedicated to helping the downtrodden and you aren’t rich, I stand by my statement. Here are some numbers for ya to chew on. How many lawyers are there? The American Bar Association has a pdf file that breaks down the number of lawyers by state for 2003 and 2004. You need Adobe reader, which you can get for free here. And the link to that data is right here.

Bottom line? Over one million lawyers in America! Holy crap! All of them suing the crap out of someone as we speak. What do these people earn in income? Here is a chart that reveals that. The lowest is about $59,000 and it can go to $80K or over $100,000 depending on the size of the firm. And that is the first year out of law school! I repeat – holy crap!

Here is a list of the top law firms and their gross take. Yikes.

What we need is tort reform. “Tort” What the hell is that? The sound a turtle makes when it farts? Whatever, here is a link to the America Tort Reform Association.

My take on this? Limit the number of lawyers able to practice law in a state to a certain percentage of the population. Another suggestion I have is to change the law so that when a scumbag attorney gets someone to sue on the basis off “You only pay if we win” , they actually can be required to pay for court costs and other lawyer fees if they lose. Both the law firm and the party split the cost. That way, there is some risk associated with filing stupid lawsuits.

Speaking of stupid law suits, her are some real lawsuits taken from the ATRA website.

Woman Sues Over Eating Ban on Buses

Jamila Glauber filed a lawsuit against the transit system in Juneau, Alaska, because a driver’s attempt to enforce the well-known no-eating rule on a bus caused her, she says, at least $50,000 worth of emotional distress; she was trying to eat a Snickers bar.

Couple sue airline over legroom

The Chicago Sun- Times reports May 14, 2004 that a Cook County, Illinois, couple is suing American Airlines because they didn’t have enough leg room and subsequently were cramped aboard a flight to Paris.

They are seeking more than $100,000.

No Tape for Those Packages

The post office in Fulton, Missouri, removed a tape dispenser that had long been available for customers for sealing packages because a customer who had hurt himself using it had filed a claim against the U.S. Postal Service.
>>> How the hell do you hurt yourself with a tape dispenser??????

And this one really takes the cake:

TOP TRIAL LAWYER SUES FORMER CLIENT FOR 18 MILLION DOLLARS FOR FILLING A STATE BAR COMPLAINT!!

Two of the wealthiest, most prominent, most politically connected Trial lawyers in the history of American Jurisprudence filed an 18 million dollar lawsuit against a former client merely for filing a State Bar complaint. The 4th appellate and 2nd appellate districts found the suit to be an “illegal” SLAPPsuit (Stragetic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) filed solely to “punish” her for filing a State Bar complaint. California law prohibits the filing of retaliatory lawsuits for the filing of State Bar complaints. Moreover, the Court of Appeals found that the action was not a “valid” exercise of their constitutional rights since it did not seek to vindicate a legally cognizable right, but merely to “punish.” The trial lawyers have now appealed to the California Supreme Court!!!!!!!! Having lost all assets defending against this SLAPPsuit spanning nearly a decade, the client is setting up a client trust fund and can be reached at twoterryz@earthlink.net .

Which brings me to lawyer jokes:

Q: If you are stranded on a desert island with Adolph Hitler, Atilla the Hun, and a lawyer, and you have a gun with only two bullets, what do you do?
A: Shoot the lawyer twice.

Q: What’s the difference between a dead dog in the road and a dead lawyer in the road?
A: There are skid marks in front of the dog.

A newly established lawyer, wanting to impress the first client coming into his office, picked up the phone and said, “I’m sorry, but I have a tremendous case load and won’t be able to look into this for at least a month.” He then hung up, turned to the young man in his office and asked, “What can I do for you, sir?” “Nothing,” replied the young man. “I’m just here to hook up your phone.”

A blind bunny and a blind snake were born at the same time, and grew up together, becoming the best of friends. Neither one knew what kind of creature the other one was, and one day decided to touch each other and describe the sensations. The snake went first – “You’re all furry, have two ears and a fluffy little tail.” The bunny was overjoyed, shouting, “I’m a bunny, I’m a bunny!” Then the bunny felt the snake – “You’ve got slimy skin, beady eyes and a forked tongue.” The snake moaned, “Oh, no, I must be a lawyer…”

A truck driver would amuse himself by running over lawyers. Whenever he saw a lawyer walking down the side of the road he would swerve to hit him, enjoy the load, satisfying “THUMP”, and then swerve back onto the road.

(At this point some of you are probably wondering how the trucker could distinguish the lawyers from the humans. Obviously he saw the trail of slime they left!)

One day, as the truck driver was driving along he saw a priest hitchhiking. He thought he would do a good turn and pulled the truck over.

He asked the priest, “Where are you going, Father?”

“I’m going to the church 5 miles down the road,” replied the priest.

“No problem, Father! I’ll give you a lift. Climb in the truck.” The happy priest climbed into the passenger seat and the truck driver continued down the road.

Suddenly the truck driver saw a lawyer walking down the road and instinctively he swerved to hit him. But then he remembered there was a priest in the truck with him, so at the last minute he swerved back away, narrowly missing the lawyer. However even though he was certain he missed the lawyer, he still heard a loud “THUD”. Not understanding where the noise came from he glanced in his mirrors and when he didn’t see anything, he turned to the priest and said, “I’m sorry Father. I almost hit that lawyer.”

“That’s okay”, replied the priest. “I got him with the door!”

Monday Madness

August 23rd, 2004 by Howard | No Comments | Filed in Main

If you enjoy old black and white photographs of people long since gone, this is an interesting website for you.

From the intro to the site: “Adopt a Photo displays historical photographs of people for the purpose of providing a temporary space for homeless photos found in antique malls, stores and private collections. It is hoped that photographs can be claimed by relatives who are researching genealogy. The site also includes educational lessons that can be used in the classroom with students. A few of the photos are privately owned and have been loaned to www.adoptaphoto.com. The web site was created and is maintained by Anne White.”

Check it out.

Meanwhile, I am introducing a new feature to this blog, ah, well, wait a minute. I was going to introduce “Monkey Monday”, but apparently someone beat me to it. Go here and see.

So, I thought I would switch to beavers. You know, have a critter Monday thing going. I started searching for beavers, and you won’t believe what I found. Beaver Nelson. I’m not sure if this is legit or not. Kind of hope not. Not sure how he got the name Beaver, but his photo does go a long ways toward explaining it.
So, go check out Beaver Nelson.

If anyone knows anything about this, er, ah, singer….leave a comment.

That’s about it for today. Still not cranky, but work should be getting intense the next few weeks, so I should be back to my old cranky self soon. Peace out people.

10 visitors online now
10 guests, 0 members
Max visitors today: 18 at 07:34 am PDT
This month: 31 at 09-05-2010 06:57 pm PDT
This year: 36 at 07-05-2010 04:35 pm PDT
All time: 36 at 07-05-2010 04:35 pm PDT

Some Blogging Guy is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache