There has got to be a better way. And there is. Voting that is, and getting rid of these two polarizing political parties. (Republicans and Democrats.) Look at the 2000 election. Of those who voted, and that’s another rant later on in the week, the nation was split right down the center. Look at the polls for the upcoming election – again, split. How is it that someone can be elected to the office of President of the United States with less than 50% of the vote?
The current system is geared to keep out any new voices. Just look at the Democrats suing to keep Nader off the ballot. (I thought every vote, and thus every candidate counted???) .
Take me for instance. I’ve rarely, if ever, voted for someone. I’ve usually voted for the lesser of two evils. Or I voted “against” someone. This presidential election I am very disappointed with the Democratic Party. Where the hell are the strong competent good Democrats? (I know my conservative friends are screaming now, but there really are some!) How the hell did they let Kerry crawl out from under his rock and get the nod? Compare Kerry to Lieberman. No comparison in my book. So, despite having serious problems with Bush, the chances are that I will vote against Kerry. But not really for Bush. As a vote for Bush is a vote against the common man, against the environment, against worker rights, for huge business, for huge government, for poor immigration policy and so forth. Yet, how could I vote for the Senator who during those rare moments when he happened to be in the neighborhood to actually vote, voted along the farthest left lines possible! ?
If there were other good candidates running for office, voting for them would be throwing your vote away. Unless you deluded yourself into thinking that it was “making a statement”.
But, what if you could vote for someone you really liked? It can happen, if America switches to the Instant Runoff voting system, sometimes called the Condorcet’s method. Here is how it works. Let’s say there are five people running for office. Two major parties, and three other candidates. You vote for all of them, by ranking them 1 to 5. Your favorite candidate you vote with a 1 next to his/her name. Your next favorite gets a 2, and so on.
Here is the cool thing. When votes are being counted, one candidate must achieve above 50% of the vote to win. If they don’t, then there is an instant runoff. They take whoever received the least votes, and toss that loser out of the race. Then, all those votes for him get recounted, using the #2 candidate on those ballots. They keep doing this until one candidate has more than 50% of the vote.
This system allows more candidates and parties, and thus more ideas and more voter choice.
There are lots of places to read about this, but John Anderson (remember him? I actually voted for him back in my liberal days….) explained it pretty well in this article.
Go read it.. Unless you are way out there to the left with the socialists and communists, or way out there to the right, this current system leaves much of America without a candidate. Which is probably what they want.